tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30306615.post1833146178490367617..comments2024-02-28T11:29:36.860-05:00Comments on just up the pike: road code changes ditch trees, embrace ironyDan Reedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10594208011755406956noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30306615.post-18356204160468186442008-09-26T11:18:00.000-04:002008-09-26T11:18:00.000-04:00It's funny how times change and attitudes and expe...It's funny how times change and attitudes and expectations change as well.<BR/><BR/>Watching a recent PBS retrospective on the history of Warner Brothers, a short clip had Bette Davis's character challenging her romantic partner with the statement "up around the corner we'll be coming to a tree in the middle of the road". And sure enough, right in the middle of the road in something a lot like the County's new darling of design, the Roundabout, was a tree. It was a large tree, a sturdy tree, well and appropriately marked, and Bette Davis drove right into it as fast as she could.<BR/><BR/>So much for safety measures inherent in design.<BR/><BR/>All along Parkland Drive and assorted other streets in Aspen Hill, are trees which were planted about 40 years ago in the then-brand-new neighborhood. I'm quiet aware of the timeframe because I'm the kid who walked the length of Parkland Drive about ten time, collecting signatures on petitions. <BR/><BR/>I freely admit that this was done for purely selfish reasons for me and my family, and for those like us. Our ancestry is Black Forest German, and we are pale and prefer to march in the shade, and will petition in the hot summer sun to get our shade in which to walk.<BR/><BR/>In the 40 years since those trees were planted, I can't remember one person getting killed by the trees. By telephone poles, certainly; by people running stop-signs, yes, I've seen those dead in by very own front yard, many times. But those people certainly didn't die because the trees obstructed the signage; we're diligent citizens and like to clear the vegetation to provide sightlines. We have to look at less dead people that way, and can't therefor feel the guilt that would be proper for an omission of action contributory to human death. <BR/><BR/>Yet the County has some rather strange policies regarding the trees on the medians and "no man's land" right of way strips between the curbs and sidewalks. <BR/><BR/>It is evidently illegal for private citizens to trim these trees to remove obstructions of sightlines and menaces of good order and public safety. <BR/><BR/>And so I must freely confess my crimes against the taxpayer! <BR/><BR/>At certain dangerous intersections, where one sees drivers taking clear and clearly-unnecessary risks poking out into traffic to see around unmaintained County vegetation, at night I sneak out, dressed in black, armed with garden tools, and live my secret other life as Stealth Ninja Landscaper.<BR/><BR/>Hey, we can't all be the Batman, dontcha know. But it's still a public-safety gig.<BR/><BR/>But now the County, in its wisdom, has decided that the only way to deal with hazards posed by trees that it both refuses to maintain and prohibits others to maintain, is to rip out the trees which exist and to refuse to plant others.<BR/><BR/>Thinking back to those days when I got sunburnt to peeling and beyond, just so that years hence I could walk to the Library without getting another sunburn, I have to wonder whether or not this is even more anti-Germanic sentiment. Rip out the trees, that'll teach 'em. Call it public safety, even though if there is a hazard the hazard exists because we the County government have prohibited public maintenance of a public amenity.<BR/><BR/>And as to the purported deadliness of median trees... if a car comes across the median out of heavy traffic into heavy traffic, don't you think it's better that less people die fetching up against a tree than would die in a head-on collision that would almost certainly launch other vehicles across the median into oncoming traffic?<BR/><BR/>Seriously, people need to take the time to think things through.Thomas Hardmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07951423786343852055noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30306615.post-34119720848285412092008-09-26T09:26:00.000-04:002008-09-26T09:26:00.000-04:00Thanks for the coverage, but you missed a terrible...Thanks for the coverage, but you missed a terrible irony here about our concerns at AAA. In the road design debates, we are all for trees, but want them set back adequately to ensure they don't limit motorists' and pedestrians' site distances, and obscure things like traffic signals, stop signs, and pedestrians and children preparing to enter the roadway. Additionally, trees set too close to roads can kill motorists who run off the roads. Here's the irony: on the day of the Planning Board hearings in which one member sarcastically refered to "Killer Trees", a Washington Post front page story told of two elderly residents of Leisure World who died when their car hit a tree on Norbeck Road. There are ways to include trees in road scapes that don't kill us. Please know that AAA has long played a role as a leader in the fight for pedestrian safety, and sponors over 36,000 children as AAA School Safety Patrols in the DC area, and I served on Doug Duncan's Pedestrian Safety Task Force a couple of years ago. We must design our roads in ways that encourage pedestrians, bikers and all users, but in the safest possible ways, and that's what I worked for in my efforts on the Road Design Study Commission. We don't want to lose one more pedestrian life, but we also don't want any more fatal crashes into trees! Thanks for your coverage! Lon Anderson, AAA Mid-Atlanticlon anderson AAA Mid-Atlantichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04298658627096881890noreply@blogger.com